'39 spange 2nd class id

[chuck303]

had er for awhile, looks just like deumer unmarked ones ive seen.
any help fellas ?? the pictures were taken with my cell, no megapixels .ugh

[Woolgar]

Hi Chuck and welcome to the forum! Looks like a Deumer but impossible to clarify with those pics I'm afraid

Nick

[rbminis]

I think the neck is too long for a Deumer. Here is mine to compare.
Ralph.

[chuck303]

Any clue on what it may be? Il see if i can get better pics up soon
Nice lookin spange bro

[chuck303]

hey guys just tried to load a killer pic of the spange, but cannot .
its an aspx file , and photobucket will not let me get the new pics up.
if anyone can tell me how i may be able to fix this drop a message,
i do accept emails so i can email the pics if someone is willing to help with an id on er,
thanks

[Adrian]

Chuck, welcome to the forum, if you are having trouble posting pics there is a guide in the Technical Forum at the very top of the forum home page. Failing that, send me an email with the pics and I will post them.

[Adrian]

Posting this one on behalf of Chuck.......

[KSH]

These EK Spangen are not my forte really (I have only one EKI Spange myself, no EKII Spange yet), but the design in question is for sure not of Deumer. It reminds me most of the design that Funcke & Brüninghaus (L/56) used on their 2nd pattern EKII Spangen. The curvature of the "leg" of the last '9' in the box is especially characteristic of the design of this maker as I recall it.





Hochachtungsvoll,

Kenneth S-H.

[Woolgar]

Looking at the clearer photo, thos oversized feet look concerning

ps I agree, clearly not a Deumer !

Nick

[KSH]

Looking at the clearer photo, thos oversized feet look concerning

ps I agree, clearly not a Deumer !

Nick

I do not quite understand your concern over the "oversized" talons, Nick - proportions of the talons look just right for a L/56 IMO.



Original L/56:





Hochachtungsvoll,

Kenneth S-H.