Become our sponsor and display your banner here
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Eisernes Kreuz 2. Klasse for review

Article about: hey everybody, New to the forum and to collecting. I recently purchased a Eisernes Kreuz 2. Klasse and would appreciate any thoughts as to it's authenticity. It is magnetic, seems to be of a

  1. #1

    Default Eisernes Kreuz 2. Klasse for review

    hey everybody,

    New to the forum and to collecting. I recently purchased a Eisernes Kreuz 2. Klasse and would appreciate any thoughts as to it's authenticity. It is magnetic, seems to be of a three piece construction, and the ribbon does not seem to glow under blacklight. The maker's mark appears to be 50, but i can't seem to find any info on the maker. Any opinions as as to if it is genuine or not would be greatly appreciated as well if anyone has any info as to the the maker. thanks!!
    Attached Images Attached Images    

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    P
    Many
     

  3. #2

    Default

    Hello and welcome to the forum!
    It would be a great help if you would post larger photos to aid us in assisting you. This allows members to enlarge them to view them better.
    The photos I post are usually in the 150-200 kb size. Our photo hosting capability will allow photos this size easily. I see that yours are in the 18-20 kb range.
    Ralph.
    Searching for anything relating to, Anton Boos, 934 Stamm. Kp. Pz. Erz. Abt. 7, 3 Kompanie, Panzer-Regiment 2, 16th Panzer-Division (My father)

  4. #3

    Default

    50 is Karl Gschiemeister Wien.looks ok.

  5. #4

    Default

    Looks like a mm 56 to me, but better pictures is needed.

    /Jonas

  6. #5

    Default

    Thanks everyone for your replies. Here are some larger pics.
    Click to enlarge the picture Click to enlarge the picture Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0058.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	221.0 KB 
ID:	844900   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0059.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	224.7 KB 
ID:	844901  


  7. #6

    Default

    Quote by harryamb2 View Post
    50 is Karl Gschiemeister Wien.looks ok.
    This hersteller did not make the EK Harry. From the new pics it's most definitely a Souval cross, but the mm is not correct.....

    Regards

  8. #7

    Default

    Indeed a Souval as Nick says.

    The numbers on o Souval should be 98 or L58 but not in the style of the above example

    Nick
    "In all my years as a soldier, I have never seen men fight so hard." - SS Obergruppenfuhrer Wilhelm Bittrich - Arnhem

  9. #8

    Default

    The stamp in my Souval for compare :-)

    Mfg
    Marc


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image-1936416696.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	39.3 KB 
ID:	844963
    Wir kapitulieren niemals !

  10. #9

    Default

    Indeed a Souval cross

  11. #10

    Default

    Thanks everyone for all the great info!! The makers mark doesn't appear to be 98 it also is not within the rectangle indention like i have seen on most makers marks. Is this a bad sign? I will try to get better pics of the mark, though it has proven difficult to photograph. It looks like a 5 without the rounded bottom portion of the number fully complete and then a 0 that has been turned horizontally. Also I have been researching Souval made crosses since it was mentioned. I found a great thread "Wartime v Postwar Souval EK2." by forum member Adrian, showing Wartime vs Postwar examples of a Souval. And to me mine seems to have all 5 of the wartime characteristics. Would u guys agree with that? I hope Adrian will not mind me posting his example from the thread.



    Name:  Copy (2) of Picture 5098.jpg
Views: 81
Size:  45.9 KB
    1. - Distinctive outer corners, known as 'birds foot' due to the resemblance to the three toes found on a birds foot!
    2. - Very rounded inner corners next to the swastika.
    3. - Thicker beading on the postwar example compared to the wartime cross
    4. - Die flaw on the top of the 12 o'clock arm linking three beads together
    5. - Wartime made Souvals didn't have the jump ring or suspension ring attached to the rear of the frame. They were attached on the front side only.

    I have also read that the swastika being slightly lower in height than the frame is another sign of war time Souval, which mine has. Is this true? So what do u guys think war time or post war? Again thanks so much for all the help I'm learning a lot!! And thanks Adrian for the great thread!!

Similar Threads

  1. Eisernes Kreuz 2. Klasse for review

    In Imperial Germany and Austro-Hungary
    02-22-2015, 09:13 PM
  2. Eisernes Kreuz 1. Klasse for Review.

    In 1939 Eisernes Kreuz forum
    12-03-2014, 09:34 PM
  3. Eisernes Kreuz 2. Klasse '52' for review

    In 1939 Eisernes Kreuz forum
    02-02-2014, 01:17 PM
  4. Eisernes Kreuz 1. Klasse for review

    In 1939 Eisernes Kreuz forum
    08-24-2012, 01:13 AM
  5. Eisernes Kreuz 2. Klasse, '86' for review

    In 1939 Eisernes Kreuz forum
    03-07-2012, 01:47 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •