Ek2 ' full' juncker

[Woolgar]

At last , I have just bought a full Juncker !

Comments welcome guys!

Adrian, can you point out to me the 3 flaw frame on these please?

Cheers

Nick

[talltom]

very nice nick is it on the back left hand top corner??

[Nick Hessens]

Very nice Juncker, mate! Congrats.

I'm hungry again..............

Regards

[Adrian]

At last , I have just bought a full Juncker !

Comments welcome guys!

Adrian, can you point out to me the 3 flaw frame on these please?

Cheers

Nick

Here you go Nick. I used my example as the flaws are easier to make out than on the pics above. The flaws on the Juncker frames are all where the beading meets the step, before the main edge of the frame. There are three of them as arrowed below. Obviously they are easier to see on some crosses than others but they should all be present in some shape or form on Juncker frames.

Apologys for the the points of the arrows being a couple of mm out if you enlarge the photo, The positioning looked OK when I added them to the pic.

[Eric Zentner]

Congrats Nick and thanks Adrian for that info.

Eric

[MD Helmets]

Stickgrenade: Excellent cross, love it!

Adrian, I have learned something today, thank you, lol

[Adrian]

The core on Nick's cross compared to my example is also a different type, look at the differences in styles of the dates. You will also note a massive flaw in the date on Nick's cross. Where the '1' and '9' join in the 1939 there is a lump of excess material joining the two numbers together. No problem with it of course, a Juncker core type distinguishing feature.

[CARL]

Congrats Nick and thanks Adrian for that info.

Eric

One must echo Eric's sentiments, another fine example Nick, and beautifully highlighted (using his own wonderful example), by Adrian.

Thank you gents.

Regards,

Carl

[Woolgar]

Cheers guys, and Adrian many thanks for that education

Nick

[ObKrieger]

Nick, great cross yet again my friend.

Adrian, I am having trouble spotting any flaws. Maybe they would be easier to see in hand?