Two EKII's 1939 makermarked 24 and 27 - Are they the real deal?

[KSH]

Hi guys,

I would appreciate some input regarding the EKII's and their authenticity. They look good to me, however there are members here with much more experience and knowledge than me.

All information is much appreciated.

- Kenneth

[R M Militaria]

For the cross marked '24', check the ring where it meets the medal frame. I believe it should have a stamp on there too.
The cross marked '27' Anton Nachfolger, looks in excellent condition.

[Woolgar]

They are both very nice examples !

Nick

[Americanheadcharge]

They look both good to me.

[KSH]

I can see parts (I think) of a marking on the ring attached to the frame itself, but this guild mark is very unintelligible due to small damages to the ring itself.

- Kenneth

[Snni]

Both good originals..

#24 can be found with different extra marks: WR, Oakleaf, 0, +, (), +0.
I don´t remember if there are more, but maybe someone else will.

#27 are with a Souval core.

Nice crosses!

[Adrian]

No problems here, there is a thread about the extra marks on '24' marked crosses here.

[KSH]

I thank you all for your expertise in the field of EKs.

Snni: Do you know if it was common for Vienna-based makers to use cores from Souval instead of making their own cores?

- Kenneth

[Snni]

I thank you all for your expertise in the field of EKs.

Snni: Do you know if it was common for Vienna-based makers to use cores from Souval instead of making their own cores?

- Kenneth

Sorry for the late reply!

I think #27, Orth (L/14) and Souval (of course) was the only ones using Souval cores.
Correct me if I wrong, guys!
Many of the different maker did use cores and frames from other makers.
You will find many crosses with S&L frames.

[3volv3]

nice looking crosses