well, why not...if they can have THEIR competition, why can't we.... (could be the shortest Thread ever!)....anyway, only nice people collect Compos....'same rules blah blah....
well, why not...if they can have THEIR competition, why can't we.... (could be the shortest Thread ever!)....anyway, only nice people collect Compos....'same rules blah blah....
One of two MK7's I got this year, this one with taped on cut down MTP cover, the owners army number showing it is an original as used example.
Regards,
Jerry
Whatever its just an opinion.
Very nice indeed.....you’re in second place! :-)
Nice...it looks unused....thank you.
It’s almost as old as you are......are you sure you’re old enough to add the great value that you do AND share professional grade photos like you do? ;-)
And never EVER say M76....Greg’s ALWAYS watching.....
Steel it ain’t :-)
Thanks for sharing...there was a time when these things were just grainy black and white pics......
It’s gone into the draw......it won’t win tho!:-)
This is the first year since about 2003 that I haven't bought a single composite. So no entry in this from me. I have, though, got several particularly good Swiss M48/62 and a very nice Portuguese M40/63 and while I am pleased I can't enter any of them in anything, except maybe under rather loose conditions; a couple of the Swiss are true M48 in that they are conversions of ex-UK wartime-product shells.
And as Jb mentioned 'M76' in connection with the Helmet Parachute....I don't see this issue as debatable at all. Either someone finds a label, manufacturer or goverment document consistently calling it the 'M76', or not. It's consistently 'not', thus far.
Similar Threads
Bookmarks