Interesting thread, guys
However, the fact remains that the NSN in 13 digit format was introduced in 1974. I remember when I enlisted in 1975 the "Old and Bold" Quartermasters staff moaning vociferously about how difficult it was to handle and account for kit that was not marked with the new NSN especially if it did have an older nomenclature stamp (many had no marks at all). We as young Toms just thought they were moaning "Jobsworths"
The problem was eased when stock that was still held at the very top of the logistic chain was retro marked with the NSN. This, cetainly in UK inventory explains why items known to originate earlier than 1974 (some even date stamped to add confusion ) bear the later nomenclature and NSN. As an aside I was issued a shaving mirror dated 1945 and some of the lads received the odd item of '44 patt webbing (jealously regarded by many but that is another subject).
Sometimes this was done by limited re-packaging or the addition of adhesive paper labels which is absolutely no help to collectors now!!
Of course, with Australia not being a NATO nation the system might have been employed slightly differently and I would not presume to disagree with someone with far greater knowledge from that perspective. I can only speak about that knowledge I have from my own service as an RQMS towards the end of my career in 1999.
This is a very interesting thread (for collectors who do descend to the almost forensic level of identifying kit ) and it would be great to find any kind of documentary evidence relating to these policies. Who knows what we might learn from that which was once just dull and boring admin?
For now, my opinion and it is just that, is that we see here at the top of the thread at least one very good example of an item manufactured before 1974 having been retro marked in the supply chain with a post 1974 NSN. Unless of course it was supplied to the forces post 1974. I don't know enough about Australian kit to know if that is even possible.
As I say, just my thoughts but it doesn't change the identity of the item in question which I think is all the more interesting for this issue.
Thanks for your input Oz, this is the way the hobby moves forward and we all learn from it to become "better collectors" if that makes sense?
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing he cares more about than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature with no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
Thank you for your detailed explanation Mark. I have no doubt that what you have said is correct for the UK. Unfortunately I do not believe that the information you have given is correct for Australian kit which is the subject of this thread. To say that all pre 1974 Australian kit bearing a 13 digit stock number must have been restamped runs totally against the evidence in my collection. Restamping an item is very difficult to do without leaving any tell-tale signs such as different inks, fonts, font sizes, alignment etc. As an example I have attached a photo of four labels all attached to the inflatable mattress cover which was fairly standard issued equipment from the 1960's through to the mid 1990's in Australia. The label on the left is dated 1964 and bears the 13 digit stock number, as do the 1967, 1990 and 1991 examples in the photo. There is no evidence of the '64 and '67 items being restamped or relabelled. I could also supply photos of my Army manuals bearing the 13 digit code and printed in the late 1960's, as well as many, many other items.
As Australian forces joined U.S. forces in Vn we had to update our supply system to be compatible and I believe this was the motivator for the urgent change to the 13 digit code. The U.S. supply system also supplied Australian forces, principally with expendable stores such as POL, food and Ammo (over 90% in the case of ammo). Although Australia was not a NATO nation we were, to coin a popular phrase of the day, "All the way with LBJ" (referring to U.S. President Johnson's visit to Australia in 1966).
Thank you for your input too Mark.
Found a couple of interesting sites - one forum and a dedicated Webbing site..... interesting discussion on development of packs over the last century!
Ditch Nylon and Plastic - Availablity of Traditional-Style Packs, Haver-& Ruck-sacks [Archive] - BushcraftOz - Australian Bushcraft Forum
webbingbabel: Start Here
" When you're chewing on life's gristle, don't grumble, give a whistle "