Hello , please opinion about this dog tag .
Dog Tag 12.SS Pz .Div.H.J. please opinion
Hello , please opinion about this dog tag .
No good in my opinion.
Surely a tag would be from a smaller unit than a division.
Cheers, Ade.
Had good advice? Saved money? Why not become a Gold Club Member, just hit the green "Join WRF Club" tab at the top of the page and help support the forum!
I recall reading somewhere that the 12th did have divisional unit tags and weren't the only division to do so. At work now so don't have time to research it but I wouldn't write this tag off just yet.
This one looks artificially aged.
Certainly the Hohenstaufen had Divisional tags but not sure about the HJ !
The gates of hell were opened and we accepted the invitation to enter" 26/880 Lance Sgt, Edward Dyke. 26th Bn Northumberland Fusiliers , ( 3rd Tyneside Irish )
1st July 1916
Thought shall be the harder , heart the keener,
Courage the greater as our strength faileth.
Here lies our leader ,in the dust of his greatness.
Who leaves him now , be damned forever.
We who are old now shall not leave this Battle,
But lie at his feet , in the dust with our leader
House Carles at the Battle of Hastings
So I looked through the SS listing on this site and came up with this:
SS Erkennungsmarken
It does not show a division roll for the unit in the examples posted.
Must be a bad one then...
I don't know if it is 100% bad, I have not had any time to do proper investigating.
The brands that see I know of the 12 significantly different.
I'd let them lie .
I cannot find any examples of a division level roll number, I think it is bad.
Similar Threads
Posting Permissions
.
Bookmarks