HI all,,,would like to hear comments on these two helmets,,,thanks,,Robert
HI all,,,would like to hear comments on these two helmets,,,thanks,,Robert
The M35 you can toss away , of the M40 ET you need a decent sharp straight on close-up , the lotnr would be helpful as well.
Both appear to be the same bad decal. When a seller gives you shots from only strange angles that is a huge red flag. As Frank says you need straight head on photos.
hi all and thanks for the replies,,,i will ask the seller for better,head on shots of the decals,,,Robert
here are more pics,,,the lot number on the m-40 is 401
I would not be pursuing either of these unless the seller agrees to send in focus head on photos. His new head on pics of the M40 decal are still at an obscene angle and out of focus, the M35 is a reapplied decal, has ink and pulver issues. The M40 is in a good lot number range, but I am not liking the liner, what is the linerband date? Something smells funny here.
What is the source of these helmets and why are they being asked for an opinion?
If for sale will he agree to have them both inspected hands on by a qualified 3rd party before money changes hands ? If not you have your answer right there.
I don't think the ET is a good one either. Like Doug says looks like two times the same fake. One on a flat surface the other one on a textured surface.
Similar Threads
Bookmarks