Hello. I wondered if sombody has any opinion about this nice dagger:=)
Regards
TommyAttachment 1231846Attachment 1231847Attachment 1231848Attachment 1231849Attachment 1231850Attachment 1231851Attachment 1231852Attachment 1231853
Hello. I wondered if sombody has any opinion about this nice dagger:=)
Regards
TommyAttachment 1231846Attachment 1231847Attachment 1231848Attachment 1231849Attachment 1231850Attachment 1231851Attachment 1231852Attachment 1231853
Last edited by tigern; 08-30-2018 at 02:38 PM. Reason: picture
Hi Tigern
The lower scabbard fitting on the scabbard does not belong and is oversized for the scabbard
The scabbard itself does not belong to the dagger itself and is an early period type.....take notice also to the scabbard fit to the lower guard.
The Tang nut does not belong and was added recently showing excessive plier marks from the dagger being opened so many times. !
The blade grip and guards appear to be consistent of the mid period detail expected to be seen on this producer type.
Nice dagger?
I would say nicely assembled from parts of other daggers. Where ever you recieived this dagger from return it !
Regards Larry
It is not the size of a Collection in History that matters......Its the size of your Passion for it!! - Larry C
One never knows what tree roots push to the surface of what laid buried before the tree was planted - Larry C
“The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” - Winston Churchill
Similar Threads
Bookmarks