It is always nice to know the thinking behind any blanket statement.
This one has been cleaned. The blade has certainly had some attention. Other parts have been cleaned and then some left in the original state.
Cheers, Ade.
It is always nice to know the thinking behind any blanket statement.
This one has been cleaned. The blade has certainly had some attention. Other parts have been cleaned and then some left in the original state.
Cheers, Ade.
Agreed, if not for any other reason then discussion, it would be interesting to see the reasons behind this statement, which at the moment gives nothing other than a negative and somewhat curt opinion
If Adrian can see no problems with it,it's almost Certainly good. William
Please inform us as to why you think this dagger is fake.Regards
Last edited by Dean; 03-30-2011 at 11:20 PM.
Gentleman this blanket statement as Ade said it is bothering eveyone too much from Arm & body. 4 post since 2009 should say it all no lavidity to it consider the source. Thats all I have to say on that and its a good Dagger by the way.
Eric
it is indeed original as Ade has said,,,,if over cleaned a bit but a nice m-33 nonetheless
Book it. It's the real deal
Hi . This dagger early, pre-rzm made, but scabbard have steel fiting, is tipical for late daggers. then the sheath is at least as the corresponding edge Logo Klass look bad, like handicraft made. Blade geometry look differet from the other blades Klaas. This is my IMHO. You can ask here,Very Interesting Klass SS Tang Mark - GermanDaggers.com but i think the answer will be the same
Regards .
Similar Threads
Bookmarks