Hello, some opinions on this dagger please guys.
Lot of pitting on the blade and the crossguards and the SS runes look also a bit suspicious to me.
Is this an totally original dagger or partial maybe.
Thanks,
K.
SS EM dagger for review
Hello, some opinions on this dagger please guys.
Lot of pitting on the blade and the crossguards and the SS runes look also a bit suspicious to me.
Is this an totally original dagger or partial maybe.
Thanks,
K.
Re: SS EM dagger for review
Avoid it. Parts dagger at best....The grip insignias are horrid.
Cheers, Ade.
Had good advice? Saved money? Why not become a Gold Club Member, just hit the green "Join WRF Club" tab at the top of the page and help support the forum!
Re: SS EM dagger for review
I agree, I do not like the motto etch on the blade.
Any maker's mark?
Ralph.
Searching for anything relating to, Anton Boos, 934 Stamm. Kp. Pz. Erz. Abt. 7, 3 Kompanie, Panzer-Regiment 2, 16th Panzer-Division (My father)
Re: SS EM dagger for review
Thx guys, was thinking the same thing.
Cheers,
Kris.
Re: SS EM dagger for review
Sometimes its entertaining to see these attempts to pass off a parts dagger as real,, but not so funny as it kills me to see history altered for a fast buck. The grip alone peaks more in volumes due to its condition which only IMO is not period with the rest of the dagger. Looking at the grain of the wood is enough to be said. Regards Larry
It is not the size of a Collection in History that matters......Its the size of your Passion for it!!- Larry C
One never knows what tree roots push to the surface of what laid buried before the tree was planted - Larry C
“The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” - Winston Churchill
Re: SS EM dagger for review
Ive seen this one on Marktplaats for some time, maker is Boker.
bad, bad dagger!
Cheers Ger
Similar Threads
Posting Permissions
.
Bookmarks