-
-
06-15-2014 09:59 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
Pain looks ok to me. 342 is the steel lot # or batch #. Removing the split pins is a huge "No No". Affects the value of the helmet. It's completely missing the liner and chin strap.
-
The paint on this looks exceptionally well preserved. Look for a maker mark/size marking around the skirt. It should be two letters and then "64" for example like this: "EF64"
The 44 dated pins combined with rough textured paint suggest to me that this helmet could possibly be unissued. We may never know if it had a liner or not, but it doesn't matter. This is a super desirable helmet shell in my opinion Go buy your friend a steak dinner.
-
Payne, I honestly don't see a shell size marking anywhere near the skirt. I do know it is a size 64 shell, though.
-
To me it looks like there are other marks before the 342, but i think this is a very light strike stamp, the maker and size could be obscured by the paint plus light strike
-
There is a chart somewhere online that shows helmet sketches of the various makers. If somebody could post it that would be great.
-
Okay, so there is a VERY faint marking of "EF64" on this Stahlhelm
-
I think it had a liner at sometime, you can see the rub marks where the spring leafs went in
-
I was thinking EF. Light maker stamps, typical EF M40/42 vent impression and exaggerated flare at the beginnings of the skirt. IMO the ding is someone messing around with a .22 after the war. As Todd said it's never a good idea to remove the pins or a liner, even if it's only a partial liner band.
-
Nice condition 42 shell with liner band. timothy
Bookmarks