Doesn't look two tone. Rather, it seems the finish has been worn or rubbed off. There are remnants of silvering to the inside of the right wing, and in the detailing of the grenade and bayonet. It looks like the wear has affected the high points of the badge, giving it a 'two shades' appearance. To the best of my knowledge, only the numbered variants had a darkened eagle.
As to whether it's original, I cannot say. I have never owned or studied these badges specifically. I'll leave it to those better qualified than myself to give you an answer.
B.B.
Photos are a bit hard to discern but this looks like a 1.26.2 from "unknown maker" #9 as referenced in Frank Heukemes book.
Looks like a nice example as these are known for their poor quality zinc which absorbs the zinc plating. Interesting how yours still has the plating on the wreath but not the eagle.
For what it is worth. This maker is noted for it's rather crude workmanship and less than elegant design (oversized head, short chest).
"Please", Thank You" and proper manners appreciated
My greatest fear is that one day I will die and my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them
"Don't tell me these are investments if you never intend to sell anything" (Quote: Wife)
Map is correct with his classification.
The badge is now attributed to Schauerte & Hohfeld and quite nice it is castle.
It is one badge that I would add to my collection.
Cheers
Doug
"Please", Thank You" and proper manners appreciated
My greatest fear is that one day I will die and my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them
"Don't tell me these are investments if you never intend to sell anything" (Quote: Wife)
thank you guys for the information im still learning these things
I agree, it's an original S&H Gab in zinc.
Not the most rare Gab around but this kind of maker isn't easy to find...
Nicola
Similar Threads
Bookmarks