I believe Jphillip is right. I think it is a sturm markings like this seem to be like the strum jacket i got a few years ago from reenacting. (Sorry I can’t find my jacket i might have given it to my unit.) New ones use RBN numbers.
1st quality of wool is a big thing (IMO), as soon as i touch sturm wool, i can tell difference between that and a original.
That fuzzy/hairy look that you see is a problem red flag, we always point that out in our unit and there is a way to get rid of it.
Sorry Eagle I have been super busy these last few days. Some unexpected things have come up.
.
Last edited by Franz1944; 06-12-2012 at 08:43 AM. Reason: spelling
Thnx Franz.
Bond, Denmark, Franz1944 and Jphillip thank you guys for helping out!.. Dont going to buy them an learnt more about the jackets !!!!!!!
Sorry Jerry, I don’t mean to offend in anyway. I don’t consider this or any other thread mine.
I do consider you a "key" member to this forum. I do really respect your say and you have taught me stuff I was not aware of. I have seen you on WAF (and here). So you’re not invisible to me. (Also like your North Africa collection a lot).
I was mostly just agreeing that it is a sturm. This tunic looks a lot like the one i use to have. Sorry if I didn’t give you credit (should of on the fuzz), I was regarding what Danmark comment on the fuzz and it was something i agreed with. DarkEagle asked where I was in the 3rd post, so I posted.
I won’t put "(IMO)". I also don’t consider myself a “flower of Key members”
I have lot of things going on personally, and i don’t want another or cause a problem, especially on this forum when it not needed.
Thanks guys and no worries, just a bit over tired yesterday.
Regards,
Jerry
Whatever its just an opinion.
Similar Threads
Bookmarks