SS Ring What do you think?

**hdmarley** · 09-20-2015, 12:45 AM

In a group photo shot yes.

**Espenlaub Militaria** · 09-20-2015 12:45 AM

We also buy and trade your items and full collections!

**Wagriff** · 09-20-2015, 12:48 AM

Very interesting,indeed.

**hdmarley** · 09-20-2015, 12:49 AM

Why is it interesting?

**Wagriff** · 09-20-2015, 12:51 AM

Because of the formerly posted grouping, that was the one ring that I had questions about..

**hdmarley** · 09-20-2015, 12:54 AM

It's a early known example. Just has condition issues obviously.

**jamoros** · 09-20-2015, 01:26 AM

Hi, does this ring being a known early example have a specific name?

**ajax3985** · 09-20-2015, 01:36 AM

by hdmarley

It's a early known example. Just has condition issues obviously.

Dustin,

That looks like a good ring but it does not look like enamel here. G see this?

**hdmarley** · 09-20-2015, 01:43 AM

Yes G seen this. I don't know of any names other than some call certain one Wilm ring or Wilm example. But im sure there are more knowledgable guys here as far as that question is concerned.

**ajax3985** · 09-20-2015, 01:58 AM

by hdmarley

Yes G seen this. I don't know of any names other than some call certain one Wilm ring or Wilm example. But im sure there are more knowledgable guys here as far as that question is concerned.

Check Pm's

**Wagriff** · 09-20-2015, 02:18 AM

Yes, it certainly has condition issues-at first glance, I had wondered if it had, perhaps, been in a fire and damaged the blacking....but when looking at the 1st photo in post #9, it is hard to understand how the left hand rune could be shaped as it is. It is far from matching the right hand rune. The top of it is curved and the bottom has a flared bottom and overall is much thicker than the other one. If it is an early authentic ring, it shows some extremely sloppy workmanship. Sorry, but it's definitely not one that I would have in my collection.