There are variations in all features of these caps. Our site has done a fine job of including these variations in hundreds of threads.
see post # 14 below.
There are variations in all features of these caps. Our site has done a fine job of including these variations in hundreds of threads.
see post # 14 below.
great thread F-B.thank you.
See the following thread for an expansion upon this theme.
https://www.warrelics.eu/forum/cloth...-strap-317701/
CMH
Thanks for the useful thread to which I made an indirect reference.
The Herstellungsvorschriften der RZM are reprinted, can be had for little money, and preclude the necessity to pry apart old, fragile caps to look for code numbers. The document in question describes the regulation manner to mark such leather goods.
In fact, collectors do huge damage to these items, a fact which can be tracked easily with the photos we download as these appear and reappear over the years.
Be it wrenching off the insignia or mangling the sweat band for the glory shot of the RZM tag or whatever, the cult of the license RZM license number and its subtle variations wreaks a lot of damage.
There is a reason to look in order to assure that one does not have a fake, but the fetish of prestige maker or some false attribute or rarity actually results in a lot of fragile material going to dust for no good reason.
Pfui.
Thanks a lot for the link to the thread
In fact, collectors do huge damage to these items -> thats why i did not notice that the chinstrap of my Black visor is marked as well
When i see an ink stamp with runes there is always something like a red alert in my head saying fake ... you know what i mean ;-)
Similar Threads
Bookmarks