Yes I agree a different camera can do that.
If you are able to take some better pics of it inside and out that would be great.
Eric
[h=3]e plu·ri·bus u·num[/h]
it's saying I'm a liar, is it not???
ok, better pics coming , might be a few days, so I can do some photo faking..all replies and info much appreciated
No, it's saying that your are new and posting a whole bunch of items up for review with a few low quality shots mixed in. Clear photos are always preferred. No one's out to get you. Again, no offence intended or implied... look forward to seeing other shots!
Sorry to disagree with you Eric, but the first armband though badly photographed appears to have diagonal lines running across the hakenkreuz which suggests to me that it is a multi part construction and not a printed version.
As to the wrong date index mark on the picture mentioned by slados28, all that means is the camera index sequence has not be set correctly, a problem I had with my first digital camera and not something I was that bothered about.
Also Bronk, best to remain calm on this forum and things will be OK
Regards,
Jerry
Whatever its just an opinion.
pretty amazing someone can tell 100% accurately the type of material from a poor pic
when I change batteries on my crappy cammera, date and year come up---I just hit enter enter....the work cam, i have no idea what info was on it
The picture with the SS tag looks like the armband is made of wool.. And the picture with the full shot of the nsdap armband looks like its made of cotton? Do you have two armbands?
Similar Threads
Bookmarks