Been a bit of a day for asking for help determining if items are right or wrong. This dagger is no exception, not concerned about the knot or the straps, just want to hear what you thing about the dagger itself.
All the best,
D
Been a bit of a day for asking for help determining if items are right or wrong. This dagger is no exception, not concerned about the knot or the straps, just want to hear what you thing about the dagger itself.
All the best,
D
No issues as far as I'm concerned, looks a nice dagger
Thats nice to hear, hopefully others agree.
D
Looks ok to me also,..... WKC crossguard
cheers Ronnie
Agreed. A good honest WKC with all the trimmings. I particularly like the snout of a beak on the eagle. As always, be Very careful about disassembling these, as the grips can be quite brittle and crack and chip very easily. The blade may possibly have been polished in the past.
William
"Much that once was, is lost. For none now live who remember it."
Great dagger and moved to Heer forum.
It is not the size of a Collection in History that matters......Its the size of your Passion for it!! - Larry C
One never knows what tree roots push to the surface of what laid buried before the tree was planted - Larry C
“The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” - Winston Churchill
Hi, you have textbook late war WKC dagger. It is very interesting that WKC used frequently C. Eickhorn´s scabbards rings - almost each late WKC scabbard has it!
Certainly nice piece which saw a lot of usage during the period - this one can tell us its history, or we just can imagine it
Regards
Peter
looks a nice dagger .........
Correct later vintage WKC as my studious friends have said..
Thanks to all for your input. I appreciate all you time and effort on this one.
D
Similar Threads
Bookmarks