-
Ehrenkreuz des Weltkriegs 1914/1918
Hello folks.
Another cheap one from the Espenlaub sale. A very nice Ehrenkreuz des Weltkriegs 1914/1918, better known by us collectors as the 'Hindenburg Cross'. Instituted in 1934 by president Paul von Hindenburg, these decorations were awarded to veterans of the First World War as a recognition of their service and sacrifice. There were three variations. This one, with swords, was awarded to frontline veterans. There was also a version without swords; awarded to non-combat veterans, and a third variation for the widows and next of kin of fallen soldiers.
This one is in great condition, minus one minor rust spot just above the '8', and bears the maker mark 'G15'.
These are very cheap awards, and have never been desirable pieces. Perhaps due to the lack of typical 'Nazi' imagery used in its design, or the fact that it is not often viewed as a 'true' Third Reich award, pertaining instead to the Great War. These are, in my opinion, an important part of any Third Reich medal collection, as they symbolise the tangible link between the two World Wars. Many recipients of these medals would go on to serve in the Wehrmacht. And the older men, previously considered too old for further military service, would ultimately be press-ganged into the Volkssturm. They would witness not only the fall of the German Empire, but of Nazi Germany as well.
Regards, B.B.
-
11-12-2018 08:26 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
-
A wonderful collection of crosses you have there! It'll be some time before I reach a collection of that magnitude. Having a complete set of three would be enough for me.
B.B.
-
by
Ullergaard
I
It was awarded 8.041.414 times, last one awarded as late as in 1969. I know if you look wiki it says 1944, but i do have a couple of books on the medal where the last medal awarded was in 1969 claimed by family.
No offense, but what's the source for that?
I have never heard of any Third Reich-era decorations being retroactively awarded after 8 May 1945, and don't think this is even legally possible.
(The sole exception - of sorts - being the Wound Badge, which under section 7 of the 1957 Ordensgesetz is allowed to be worn by everyone injured due to the effects of the war even if they had not been awarded one before the end of WWII, provided their wartime injuries and entitlement to wear the badge were officially certified by the proper FRG authorities.)
-
by
BrodieBartfast
Hello folks.
Another cheap one from the Espenlaub sale. A very nice Ehrenkreuz des Weltkriegs 1914/1918, better known by us collectors as the 'Hindenburg Cross'. Instituted in 1934 by president Paul von Hindenburg, these decorations were awarded to veterans of the First World War as a recognition of their service and sacrifice. There were three variations. This one, with swords, was awarded to frontline veterans. There was also a version without swords; awarded to non-combat veterans, and a third variation for the widows and next of kin of fallen soldiers.
This one is in great condition, minus one minor rust spot just above the '8', and bears the maker mark 'G15'.
These are very cheap awards, and have never been desirable pieces. Perhaps due to the lack of typical 'Nazi' imagery used in its design, or the fact that it is not often viewed as a 'true' Third Reich award, pertaining instead to the Great War. These are, in my opinion, an important part of any Third Reich medal collection, as they symbolise the tangible link between the two World Wars. Many recipients of these medals would go on to serve in the Wehrmacht. And the older men, previously considered too old for further military service, would ultimately be press-ganged into the Volkssturm. They would witness not only the fall of the German Empire, but of Nazi Germany as well.
Regards, B.B.
A very nice addition there B.B.
I think these crosses are underrated and every collection should have some in it.
Wilko
-
by
HPL2008
No offense, but what's the source for that?
I have never heard of any Third Reich-era decorations being retroactively awarded after 8 May 1945, and don't think this is even legally possible.
(The sole exception - of sorts - being the Wound Badge, which under section 7 of the 1957 Ordensgesetz is allowed to be worn by everyone injured due to the effects of the war even if they had not been awarded one before the end of WWII, provided their wartime injuries and entitlement to wear the badge were officially certified by the proper FRG authorities.)
Andreas:
The last known OFFICIAL decoration by the Cross of Honor dates back to September 1944 while 1945 has been mentioned by some sources as the final date.
You are correct about the official part..
But still family could apply for the medals many years after if they could document the person who was entitled the medal never got it.
-
by
Ullergaard
Andreas:
The last known OFFICIAL decoration by the Cross of Honor dates back to September 1944 while 1945 has been mentioned by some sources as the final date.
You are correct about the official part..
But still family could apply for the medals many years after if they could document the person who was entitled the medal never got it.
That's essentially the same thing as a retroactive award. The Ordensgesetz of the FRG has no legal provisions for this, although it does regulate the wearing of decorations that had been awarded up until 8 May 1945 (Imperial-, Weimar- and Third Reich era ones).
Even during the Third Reich, those eligible for the Ehrenkreuz des Weltkrieges had to actively apply for it on their own initiative before the respective cut-off dates of 31 May 1935 for the Altreich (extended to 30 June in the Saarland) and 30 September 1939 for Austria and the Sudetenland (later applications were only authorized for ethnic German inhabitants of territories annexed/occupied in the war, with regulations issued as late as September 1944). If a potential recipient missed these dates, he had waived his entitlement to the award for good.
Maybe there is some misunderstanding, and this is merely about obtaining replacement medals for official recipients, but those were not provided by the state; they had to be bought from manufacturers/retailers on one's own cost without the possibility or necessity of involving the authorities at all. Or it is about the application for a replacement certificate, which was possible, but only if the actual award had been made up until 8 May 1945. Maybe there is something that I am not aware of.
So, again, and on the risk of making a nuisance of myself: What's the documentation for the alleged possibility to apply for these awards post-WW2 and the 1969 date?
Last edited by HPL2008; 11-13-2018 at 09:38 PM.
-
by
HPL2008
That's essentially the same thing as a retroactive award. The Ordensgesetz of the FRG has no legal provisions for this, although it does regulate the wearing of decorations that had been awarded up until 8 May 1945 (Imperial-, Weimar- and Third Reich era ones).
Even during the Third Reich, those eligible for the Ehrenkreuz des Weltkrieges had to actively apply for it on their own initiative before the respective cut-off dates of 31 May 1935 for the Altreich (extended to 30 June in the Saarland) and 30 September 1939 for Austria and the Sudetenland (later applications were only authorized for ethnic German inhabitants of territories annexed/occupied in the war, with regulations issued as late as September 1944). If a potential recipient missed these dates, he had waived his entitlement to the award for good.
Maybe there is some misunderstanding, and this is merely about obtaining replacement medals for official recipients, but those were not provided by the state; they had to be bought from manufacturers/retailers on one's own cost without the possibility or necessity of involving the authorities at all. Or it is about the application for a replacement certificate, which was possible, but only if the actual award had been made up until 8 May 1945. Maybe there is something that I am not aware of.
So, again, and on the risk of making a nuisance of myself: What's the documentation for the alleged possibility to apply for these awards post-WW2 and the 1969 date?
Maybe it is just me who made a mistake..
And i think you know better than i..
Of course i can't find the info where i was sure i had the information from!
So my mistake
If i find it i will post it.
Bookmarks