Opinions?
thank you very much
Opinions?
thank you very much
Last edited by Gibello; 12-01-2012 at 12:11 AM.
A colleague who I consider an expert on these issues and a better person, told me that there are many problems with the eagle and capture.
I think he's right.........
Regards,
Steve.
He is a wise man.
Eric
[h=3]e plu·ri·bus u·num[/h]
Definitely not the extremely high standards of GWL...
William
"Much that once was, is lost. For none now live who remember it."
I'm sorry but this one looks to be a bit weak on detail for a GWL. They are a pretty good manufacturer and this looks well below their standards.The GWL mark also looks as though it has been "struck" twice as you can see a bit of a ghost of the mark.
Thank you very much everyone for your comments and your support!
I can only agree with the above comments. It is not an original GWL badge. Compared to an original there are quite a few differences on the eagle, wreath, rivets and reverse set up. It is not a bad attempt at the badge though and I'm sure many collectors would get burned by this one.
Looking for LDO marked EK2s and items relating to U-406.....
Hello there,
Can you show a good photo of the catch on this badge?
William Kramer
Sorry, but the badge is not mine.
Just gave me these pictures the seller.
Similar Threads
Bookmarks