Hi guys,
I actually think that this one may stand a pretty good chance, but I would really like your opinions.
Thanks!
Mo
Hi guys,
I actually think that this one may stand a pretty good chance, but I would really like your opinions.
Thanks!
Mo
Sorry Mo, I don't agree.
I think this makes originals 0 - fakes 4.
Compared to an original there are the same differences we've seen on the other badges you've posted, wrong reverse set up, makers mark, obverse details.
Looking for LDO marked EK2s and items relating to U-406.....
I need to study more... haha
At least I haven't bought these. Thanks for your help, it's greatly appreciated.
Hi,im sorry to say that i agree with Adrian,the rivet holding the pin to the reverse is far to big and clumsy to be a sherwin set up.Also the the fifth porthole is far to weak in its detail as an original "weak fifth porthole" sherwin has most probably been used to make the cast for this one!On an original the porthole is still clearly rectangular all be it faint, but this one is rounder.The rest of the ships details are also to soft for a quality sherwin manufactured badge. Sorry.
Similar Threads
Bookmarks