Unusual mini Mutterkreuz

[Woolgar]

What do you think about the plain back? Most unusual

Nick

[ww2fotos]

I like it. Is it much smaller than a regular MK? Is it approx. 2.3 cm long?

[leej11]

I dont know of any that didnt have an inscription on the back? I dont think I like this one. The letters look too thick and the enemal doesnt look right to me. Also is the pin construction on the back period? Well see what others say but Im not too keen on it. Regards, Lee

[militarymania]

i like this one aswell,,,,

[leej11]

Got a question. I dont have a mini to compare. Can the full size details be compared or are they that different because of size? Lee

[Woolgar]

Got a question. I dont have a mini to compare. Can the full size details be compared or are they that different because of size? Lee

Hi lee

This is what should be on the back

Nick

[leej11]

I was asking about the details of the cross like the details of the lettering, swastika and so forth. Or are they going to differ that much from maker to maker? I get the impression from the 2nd cross you posted that the details on the mini differ from the full size crosses. Lee

[ww2fotos]

I dont know of any that didnt have an inscription on the back? I dont think I like this one. The letters look too thick and the enemal doesnt look right to me. Also is the pin construction on the back period? Well see what others say but Im not too keen on it. Regards, Lee

The miniature is miniature. There is no room on the back for Hitler's signature & date. Is your miniature MK approx. 2.3 cm long?

[Woolgar]

The miniature is miniature. There is no room on the back for Hitler's signature & date. Is your miniature MK approx. 2.3 cm long?

The miniatures do have the date and sig, the Gold I posted above is a miniature

Nick
Nick

[leej11]

Thanks Wolfspear I was getting a little confused for a minute on what this thread was all about. The second one you posted has similar details as the first. The center white enemal looks better though. Lee