Although an M1 Carbine would probably look better, and weigh a lot less
on a display, the Thompson is the way I'd go - an M1 Carbine is worth
1/4 the cost of a .45 Tommy gun, IMO.........
Although an M1 Carbine would probably look better, and weigh a lot less
on a display, the Thompson is the way I'd go - an M1 Carbine is worth
1/4 the cost of a .45 Tommy gun, IMO.........
Regards,
Steve.
Its a difficult choice.
Both look great on display.
I dont know, but probably the thompson.
I will have to do a lot of thinking on this.
Thompsons are the best.
Hi Nuno I my self am torn as both are very fine firearms and either would look good displayed you have a very tough decision to make .
There are many factors to take into consideration as mentioned above to be historically correct such as is the GI an NCO what army group was he attached were did he see service .
Regards Mark K
Then I'd go for the Thompson - IMPO it just shades the M1 as being a truly classic firearm......
Can't imagine the CLASH singing a song called "M1 Carbine" ....... just doesn't have the same ring as "tommy gun"
Dan
" I'm putting off procrastination until next week "
Hard chooise.. but since the A1 have a 20 round mag I would go for the M1.
And.. the M1 is a lot lighter which makes it easier for the GI.
It is not the size of a Collection in History that matters......Its the size of your Passion for it!! - Larry C
One never knows what tree roots push to the surface of what laid buried before the tree was planted - Larry C
“The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” - Winston Churchill
Similar Threads
Bookmarks