Lee Enfield

[4md]

i would go the first one because i prefer the no1 mkIII*, even though the wood has been removed or broken off near the rear sight. Going on condition the middle one looks the best.
The 1943 mk4 may have a small problem with the trigger that could be fixed easily..........so stuff it get all three

regards Paul

[MarkV]

Number 1 would be my choice, too.

[KRISSE]

Yep, definitly nr. 1!!!

[Judaz]

i would go the first one because i prefer the no1 mkIII*, even though the wood has been removed or broken off near the rear sight. Going on condition the middle one looks the best.
The 1943 mk4 may have a small problem with the trigger that could be fixed easily..........so stuff it get all three

regards Paul

Where is it broken? Cant see it.

[Vegard T]

If you can, I would go for all of them. Me personally, I would go for number 3, the trigger mechanism would probably be easy to fix after a bit of fiddling. And it looks like it has gone through quite a lot, but I guess I'm just a sucker for beat up firearms

[4md]

Where is it broken? Cant see it.

just in front of the rear site protectors, the wood is missing...... heres a photo of the same area on my rifle

[gbalke]

I would also go for the first, the No. 1 Mk III. These seems to be a better value when compared to a No. 4 based on what I've recently seen on on-line auctions.

[crites1234]

I'd definitely take the bottom one my personal opinion

[HARRY THE MOLE]

Go for the No1 Mk111* - a much nicer looking rifle.

[samnev]

Another vote for Number 1. As others have said more impressive in a display with it's long sword bayonet.