I dont have a preference for neither Walther nor Mauser and I have seen some horrible and rough examples of Spree manufactured P-38s over the years
Some Spree P-38s are of very late war manufacture and with their rough finish and machine marks, they have the look of handguns being thrown out the back window of the Spree factory with the Russians entering the front door. Abominable or no finish.
Goes without saying, that rough or no finish and a multitude of machine marks might mean equally shoddy QC.
Your Spree P-38 looks to be one of the better examples.
Personally, I couldnt give a hoot whether its a Mauser, Walther or a Spree - as long as its a nice P-38.
Of course you are happy with it - you should be; its looks to be a nice gun.
I must stress, that I did not mean to put down your fine handgun (see above). Mine was only a safety concern.
On another note; Its difficult to tell from your pics, but does your grips have five or six lines interrupted by the screw hole in the grip?
Spree P-38s first run guns had grip slabs by Walther but switched to Julius Posselt in the middle of 1943.
Julius Posselt grips have five lines interrupted by the grip screw hole.
Walther/AEG grips have six interrupted lines.
Some Spree P-38 general info.
Spreewerke did not use a two digit year code hence dating them can be a chore.
During Spreewerk's first year of production, about 7,000 pistols left the factory. This means the year ended with guns that still did not have a suffix. The first 500 cyq pistols were built with a mix of some small parts supplied by Walther. thus some early Spreewerks might have the 'e/359' proof mark on some minor parts.
In 1943, Spreewerk produced 108,000 pistols; more than Walther, but less than Mauser. These pistols were of good quality, but were still not as nice as the P.38s from the other factorys. The final pistols for this year ended in the 'k' block.
In 1944, the factory built about 127,000 pistols, with the final ones for the year in the 'y' block. There are no CYQ pistols in the 'q' block This year marked a sharp decline in the fit and finish found on all P.38s, but most of all with Spreewerke examples. Some pistols made during this year were built using frames supplied by FN of Belgium. Many 'fnh' marked barrels were also used. In the autumn, some cyq pistols were assembled with what are called 'cog' hammers today. These hammers were also used some by Walther in 1945, and they had a simplified style of grooving from the original hammers. The 'cog' hammers were manufactured by an unknown subcontractor and are unmarked. Mauser never used this part. By the W or X block, unpolished machine markings were common place on Spreewerke P.38s.
In 1945, Spreewerk used up all the alphabet and started over by adding an 'a' prefix rather than suffix. This was continued witha 'b' prefix block, and then a '0' was used rather than a letter for the next batch. Finally a '00' prefix was used in May on about 100-200 pistols, produced under communist occupation. As enemy troops were pressing in and about to overrun the factory, the 'WAA88' proof marking was abandoned in favour of a faster and simpler 'u' single digit stamp. There is no evidence that the code was changed from 'cyq' to 'cvq.' On the contrary, all of it points to this marking being a damaged stamp. Spreewerke managed to assemble 41,000 pistols before the factory was captured in early April. Some pistols made during this time had FN slides with the 'ac43' code on them.
Ozark Bear Arms Blog: The Walther P.38 Pistol Series
Last words of caution:
-Dont use ammo also loaded for cycling SMGs in these - slides have been known to crack.
-Dont trust the decocking mechanism. They have been known to fail.
Bookmarks