Bravo !! As far as fake ?? Do you mean reproduction of original negatives ? Everything looks fine, especially now that they have been scanned !!
I'd rather be A "RaD Man than a Mad Man "
That's what I mean 1,2,3,4, 5,11,16,17,18 Those are you very doubtful about me
That's what I mean
Agree with Gwar.. These photos look to be all period originals.. I wouldn't mind having them in my collection..
Smitty
Always a bit difficult to tell, but the ones of the funeral procession, 1,2,3,4, 16, 17 appear to have. red/purple cast to the pictures, which could either be that they have been processed using contaminated print developer. Such things are possible of originals or copies. As all of the above are of the same subject, as long as they are all the same size prints I believe they, and the rest are all good.
Fakes can be digital prints on modern papers, also fake photos or reproductions may lack a full contrast range, if printed correctly photos should have a full range from white thru grey to black.
Yes 1 to 4 are the same size
and 16 and 17 are much larger
Do you think there may be post-war copies excuse me if I have not understood correctly I do not know English and I use a google translator
There was an Adolf Peressich, a Yugoslavian photographer who was taking pictures before the war, these may or may not be by him. I think they are good and probably printed in different sizes for reasons of possible publication at the time. Apart from the colour issue, which is not always sign of fakes but can be down to poor chemicals at the time and age, I see no problems with any of them.
Thank you very much for the information I appreciate it!
Similar Threads
Bookmarks