2 jackets revieuw.

[DarkEagle]

Hey,

I think there fake but can anyone tell me why i think that haha .

Here the are:

first one:

[DarkEagle]

And the second one:















So who got info about them before i buy them?..

[Franz1944]

why you think they are bad? i will take a closer look at Heer tunic when i get back, unless someone beats me to it.

[DarkEagle]

When do you get back?.

Who else can help?..

[Danmark]

The nap ( fuzz ) is still on the wool - it wears off with age - that's always the first thing I look for.
The Heer seems to be TOO fuzzy, but the KM has lost some nap ( the photo with the button you can see the weave showing through )

Dan

[DarkEagle]

So you think the HEER is problily fake and the KM could be real?.

[Jerry B]

Why does the KM jacket have a 43 date on the label (in a format that looks more like the Allies used and not like those I remember seeing on German uniforms) and have a M31 stamp on the lining? Also, I don't recognise this type of jacket as being used by the KM?!!

[Danmark]

So you think the HEER is problily fake and the KM could be real?.

I don't know ENOUGH to say yes or no - I just mentioned something to look for with old cloth.
There are more qualified on this forum than I but you HAVE to ask yourself, " does this look ( & smell ) like it is 70 years old?"

Dan

[DarkEagle]

I also have never seen an KM like that. What do you think about the HEER?..

[JPhilip]

Hello,
I'm not specialized enough in KM uniforms to comment this one, but as already mentioned i don't remember seeing such a garment before....

Concerning the Heer Feldbluse, from these photos, it looks like a postwar Sturm production to me, a modern product that received some special treatment to look older and used....IMO lining and cloth tab at the back of the neck are good giveaways...(but i could be wrong of course.....)
Thanks