Hi Luca!...Looks like a typical WKC...with the logo placed on the front of the blade. Salty and untouched. Did you just add this to your colleoction Regards Larry
It is not the size of a Collection in History that matters......Its the size of your Passion for it!! - Larry C
One never knows what tree roots push to the surface of what laid buried before the tree was planted - Larry C
“The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” - Winston Churchill
Looks good.
Had good advice? Saved money? Why not become a Gold Club Member, just hit the green "Join WRF Club" tab at the top of the page and help support the forum!
Nice origional looking KM dagger luca
Mac 66.
thanks a lot guys...your opinion is very appreciated
It looks ok. (Quite a lot of gold gilding missing.)
The only thing i seem as problem - portepee is subsequently added to the dagger, and I'm not sure that is Naval or Herr.
Can you put some more photos in this style?
Regards
Vedran
The best way to see if the portepee was added would to look beneath the knot..and see if any verdigris may be present..or any trapped dirt between the knot and the dagger.
Not untying it but looking around the knot itself.
It is not the size of a Collection in History that matters......Its the size of your Passion for it!! - Larry C
One never knows what tree roots push to the surface of what laid buried before the tree was planted - Larry C
“The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” - Winston Churchill
It looks ok, navy portepee the middle period.
Regards
Vedran
Larry knocked the nail on the head. I don't know much about army daggers, never owned one either. But they are nice things to look at I must admit, this one looks good.
I particulary like the greening to the bottom of the scabbard, this help supports evidence that it has always been with the dagger.
best matty
Similar Threads
Bookmarks