Pictures aren't brilliant but I would give it a tentative thumbs up Emo.
You really need to see if that blue enamel is translucent. If it is I would say it is a good one.
The accepted criteria for deducing a cross is a fake is that the white border is broader than seen on original and the blue enamel is opaque.
I do have some original crosses from various makers that do have a broad border
All the best
Doug
Thank you!
I'll want more photos from the seller and if I give me, I'll post them
I think its good too.
Thank you!
I would enjoy more opinions
Looks good to me.
He seems to be wounded Mutterkreuz
because of the darker color of the back
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing he cares more about than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature with no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
Late war because the base metal is a greyish alloy amd not the early war quality awards
Late war has a bad enamel
While the early war is better in quality
I have heard this but I do not know how true it is. I apologize for my bad English
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing he cares more about than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature with no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."
Similar Threads
Bookmarks