Let me conclude with the following. Future posts of this nature, will not upset me in the least, or give me the urge to post a few "F" words. Although they may be directed towards me - Metallwarenfabrik - i cant take them personally, because "Jo" has nothing to do with this, it is common logic, forensic science, and after you have taken your time to understand it, it is irrefutable.
(Unless you are a flat earth society member, or just one of those humans who cant think logically, they are about i know.) Now as much as they wont upset me, i cant spend my time trying to debate with people about a topic that they are not even bothered to inform themselves of before they start with wild speculation and the rest. This started a while ago, and now that my book is out, will only increase. I am aware of a group pf people who are intent on doing everything they can, in order to shun the 21st century, advanced research, done in my book. Claim that forensic science is something that only Interpol needs to use, and we should rather just jump all over Jo and make him look silly, then he will have a fit and go away - and we can all go back to our Detlev Niemann books, and continue giving each other the thumbs up on a forum.
That will not happen i am afraid. I cant debate though, on a subject of this nature, with individuals who have not informed themselves,
thoroughly, on the subject beforehand, and who actually have something of factual use to bring to a debate on it, should they need further clarification. I have said time and time again, that the use of forensic science, is a vast, and complicated subject that needs to be understood, before it can be correctly implemented. And that it cannot be just laid open on a forum thread for all to "instantly understand". But not much of what i am posting seems to be being read by anyone, does it - So in the greater interests (as always) of the community, i will not be commenting on any questions of this nature posed to me for a while. A good meal needs time to digest
Bookmarks