Become our sponsor and display your banner here
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

U-boot Kriegsabzeichen, orginal?

Article about: photo photo 2x clic

  1. #11

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435234193_dsc00047.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	109.2 KB 
ID:	855949Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435234233_dsc00046.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	231.5 KB 
ID:	855950Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435306516_dsc00049.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	221.7 KB 
ID:	855951Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435306542_dsc00050.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	113.9 KB 
ID:	855952
    Quote by Norm F View Post
    It could very well be a copy, but it's not 100% clear on these photos. As mentioned, the surface defects are very suspicious, and it's clear they were part of the surface before the finish was applied and not dents occurring afterwards from wear.

    Nevertheless, the tooling mark on the upper part of the pin looks very close to originals, as does the faint maker mark and the crimped catch. (In the original used in the attached comparisons the catch was loose in the crimp and rotated 180 degrees, but you get the idea anyway).

    If we saw other copies with the same surface defects (as is the case with many Staegemeir high-end fakes) then that would be the clincher that this is a fake, but so far this is the only odd one like this to show up on the forums.

    Certainly it's not a "one look, thumbs down" badge (although it may still end up as a "fourth look, thumbs down" badge eventually).

    Best regards,
    ---Norm
    copy to 100000% see photos

    - - ------- - -

    photo orginal

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    P
    Many
     

  3. #12

    Default

    photo orginalClick image for larger version. 

Name:	1435437846__________________________________________________________r.k.____________.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	132.3 KB 
ID:	855953Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435439790__________________________________________________________r.k.__1_____________________.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	99.8 KB 
ID:	855962Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435441042__________________________________________________________r.k.__1___________.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	200.8 KB 
ID:	855961Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435439627__________________________________________________________r.k.__1___________.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	198.4 KB 
ID:	855960Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435439442__________________________________________________________r.k.____________.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	179.5 KB 
ID:	855959Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435438774__________________________________________________________r.k.______________.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	168.9 KB 
ID:	855958Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435438021__________________________________________________________r.k.______________.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	110.4 KB 
ID:	855957Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435437996__________________________________________________________r.k.________________________.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	92.3 KB 
ID:	855956Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435437977__________________________________________________________r.k.__1_____________.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	149.6 KB 
ID:	855955Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435437892__________________________________________________________r.k.__1_____________.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	84.0 KB 
ID:	855954Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1435441172__________________________________________________________r.k.____________.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	195.1 KB 
ID:	855963 2 2 knocks of original cf.

  4. #13

    Default

    Quote by harryamb2 View Post
    afraid its a cast fake not good.
    Please confirm once more that it is a copy

  5. #14

    Default

    Quote by Wagriff View Post
    Please confirm once more that it is a copy

  6. #15

    Default

    Quote by Norm F View Post
    It could very well be a copy, but it's not 100% clear on these photos. As mentioned, the surface defects are very suspicious, and it's clear they were part of the surface before the finish was applied and not dents occurring afterwards from wear.

    Nevertheless, the tooling mark on the upper part of the pin looks very close to originals, as does the faint maker mark and the crimped catch. (In the original used in the attached comparisons the catch was loose in the crimp and rotated 180 degrees, but you get the idea anyway).

    If we saw other copies with the same surface defects (as is the case with many Staegemeir high-end fakes) then that would be the clincher that this is a fake, but so far this is the only odd one like this to show up on the forums.

    Certainly it's not a "one look, thumbs down" badge (although it may still end up as a "fourth look, thumbs down" badge eventually).

    Best regards,
    ---Norm
    Please porwierdzenie or a copy

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •