Military Antiques Stockholm - Top
Display your banner here
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

danger sa orginal?

Article about: Please opinions

  1. #1

    Default danger sa orginal?

    Please opinions
    Click to enlarge the picture Click to enlarge the picture danger sa  orginal?   danger sa  orginal?  

    danger sa  orginal?   danger sa  orginal?  

    danger sa  orginal?   danger sa  orginal?  


  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement danger sa  orginal?
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    P
    Many
     

  3. #2
    ?

    Default

    DANGERRRRRRRRRRRR.....well yes your right!

  4. #3

    Default

    Junk...sorry...
    William

    "Much that once was, is lost. For none now live who remember it."

  5. #4
    ?

    Default

    Do not jump the gun to write off this dagger guys so fast guys,


    maybe its not in the best conditioned blade & the grip fit at the bottom crossguard is a bit off but i have a good feeling about it,


    Larry whats your thoughts on the RZM etch ?



    Regards Mac 66.

  6. #5

    Default

    Never seen a car as a photo studio

  7. #6

  8. #7
    ?

    Default

    Quote by Mac 66 View Post
    Do not jump the gun to write off this dagger guys so fast guys,


    maybe its not in the best conditioned blade & the grip fit at the bottom crossguard is a bit off but i have a good feeling about it,


    Larry whats your thoughts on the RZM etch ?



    Regards Mac 66.

    Scott my major concerns with these 3 SA daggers are the fact that they all have the same type of wear on the blades, but when you look at the dedication of the etch its way darker and untouched inspite of the rest of the blade, for me a typical post war dedication.
    You might be right i jumped the conclusion, looking at a same type of blade with an not typical kind of rzm mark, you are probably right that this one stands a change.
    The dagger shown in this post should be a M7/1 Gebrüder Christians, Christianswerk, Solingen
    I agree that some research would not do any harm.

    Thanks Scott for keeping me sharp

    Ger

  9. #8
    ?

    Default

    Ger ignore the dedication on the dagger i posted from WAF, its the RZM etch that i was meaning to show to be the same variation as the dagger posted for opinions, see if you can find more to compare on the net as they are pretty hard to find with this RZM etch variation., could be ok ?


    Cheers Mac 66.

  10. #9
    ?

    Default

    Yes Scott it even could be ok, i have seen it on a few onces, need to see more of them to compare the gripshape and the runesbutton to call it a batch

    Ger

  11. #10

    Default

    I still believe it's an aged put together...but, either way, I would not want it in my collection...
    William

    "Much that once was, is lost. For none now live who remember it."

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Question Original German Danger sign?

    In Art - Decor - Exotica of the Third Reich
    06-24-2015, 12:41 PM
  2. Is this an authentic WW2 Danger porcelain sign?

    In Non-Combat Uniforms and related insignia of the Third Reich
    06-23-2014, 02:06 AM
  3. 03-31-2013, 01:00 AM
  4. Fear and Danger

    In Discussions
    03-16-2013, 05:44 PM
  5. Danger UXB Luftwaffe SD2

    In Ordnance and ammo
    10-11-2008, 08:31 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Adlermilitaria - Down
Display your banner here