Sleepwalker is correct that P. Weyersberg did not use the parkerizing process on its bayonets (Parkerizing in the TR period a proprietary process of the Parker Rust-Proof Company using phosphate to...
Type: Posts; User: Frogprince; Keyword(s):
Sleepwalker is correct that P. Weyersberg did not use the parkerizing process on its bayonets (Parkerizing in the TR period a proprietary process of the Parker Rust-Proof Company using phosphate to...
As Sleepwalker stated, it seems that P. Weyersberg always serial numbered its service (S. 84/98) bayonets. Which is sometimes how you can tell if one has been altered and/or reworked at some point,...
Hello,
I understand the points being made, but I’m really only concerned with the time from 1933-1945. With 1936 when it was nationalized becoming a part of the empire that was under Himmler who...
Hello, As I know you already know, for the Wehrmacht the German Army was in charge of manufacturing the S. 84/98 bayonets and I don't have a problem with a governmental agency, authority etc. - but...
Agreeing with the above, if we want to label the term "commercial" as something else - the English word "paramilitary" could arguably I think be a good fit. With the German Police, Railway system,...
Thanks for the better quality images which is what I was hoping for, with the problem of course being that there are fakes/copies in circulation that turn up every once in a while from all sorts of...
In line with AndyB's thinking the bayonet appears in the photos to be a later one from Weyersberg which tended to use serial numbers, whereas others did not for the so-called "Commercial" bayonets. ...