Combat-relics.com - Top
Display your banner here
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures

Article about: Ground Rohm Boker in below average condition but complete and good grip condition. Dropped sheath ball tip. A gentle clean might help the appearance of this piece. Value? Maybe \\$1500? Abit m

  1. #1

    Default SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures

    Interested in find information about this dagger to see if its a fake or not and maybe potential value.

    Thanks in advance
    Click to enlarge the picture Click to enlarge the picture SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures   SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures  

    SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures   SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures  

    SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures   SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures  

    SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures  
    Last edited by Amac209; 04-02-2012 at 07:37 PM. Reason: Just attached photos

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures
    Join Date
    Always
    P
    Many
     

  3. #2
    ?

    Default re: SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures

    Looks like it has been taken apart at some point.

  4. #3

    Default re: SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures

    It's been in my possession for the last 25 years or so. Know anything else on it?

  5. #4

    Default re: SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures

    It looks to be a Rohm dedication dagger as i can see the last part of the inscription,,but why wont your photos enlarge? When clicked on a photo an advertisement appears for "Runescape toolkit.

  6. #5

    Default re: SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures

    Fixed

  7. #6

    Default re: SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures

    Thank you Amac,, but just one more request,, can you show us a more close up pic of the inscription on the back of the blade or whats left of it? I have to agree with Scout as this was possible it was taken down at some point in time as the guards IMO are not consistent with Boker types,,but yet still looking period. Regards Larry

  8. #7
    ?

    Default re: SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures

    You give me more credit, than I deserve; I just noticed, that the different parts were out of alignment.
    You obviously know more about these than I

  9. #8

    Default re: SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures

    It's in rather poor condition, as if it has been stored in an attic or somewhere
    with fluctuating temperatures and humidity. Appears original, but will not
    be worth as much as an example in 'average' condition.........
    Regards,


    Steve.

  10. #9

    Default re: SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures

    All looks bang on to me? correct mm for dedication example, but must agree with W,W on condition, and Larry on ground Rohm
    cheers Ronnie

  11. #10

    Default re: SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch: not sure about it. Posted Pictures

    Added more pictures

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 04-15-2018, 02:55 AM
  2. Another 1933 pattern SS Dienstdolch RZM 807/36

    In SS Dienstdolch, 1933 & 1936
    08-15-2012, 02:29 PM
  3. 06-17-2012, 10:56 AM
  4. 1933 pattern SS Dienstdolch 121/38

    In SS Dienstdolch, 1933 & 1936
    06-10-2012, 04:03 AM
  5. SS 1933 pattern Dienstdolch 1053/38 marked

    In SS Dienstdolch, 1933 & 1936
    05-19-2012, 11:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Military Antiques Stockholm - Down
Display your banner here