IMO. At first glance, the dagger itself looks original from the early period 1933/1934 but the blade is heavily cleaned! and the overall condition is not the best I have seen.
I have my concurns about the scabbard I cant say if this belong to this dagger.
1.The scabbard is painted While we anodized expected from this early period, but it could be a repainted early one because the fittings are nickel silver like the crossguards but where are the fitting screws?
2.It can also be a late scabbard where are the nickel silver fittings mounted on that can explain why the screws are missing
because the screw holes do not match.
Nothing wrong with the dagger except for the very bad condition.
Scabbard indeed has issues.
I hope you didn't payed to much for this dagger.
Better post here first before you buy.
This is not a dagger that's gonna sell fast in the future.
Payed 599 ink shipping. Not to bad for a SS dagger even if some parts are in rough condition. Most SS daggers sells exstremly fast as I have seen
Yes I agree with you Krisse. But a ss dagger in mint conditipn cost from 3000$ and up...
Mr Berlin..what was the price of the dagger?
It is not the size of a Collection in History that matters......Its the size of your Passion for it!! - Larry C
One never knows what tree roots push to the surface of what laid buried before the tree was planted - Larry C
The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see. - Winston Churchill