SS-Autostandarte?

[Kimo666]

Hello,
I was wondering if this one is good or bad? Does anyone know?
thanks.

[Dimas]

It's a fake

[Kimo666]

Hello,
May I ask why it's a fake?
Mfg.

[Dimas]

Obvious synthetic fake SS RZM label, and the rest of the pennant is too bad to be an original

[BOB COLEMAN]

I agree with Dimas. The construction is nothing like an original period pennant. Total 4th Reich garbage.

[Kimo666]

Hello again,
Thank you to both of you for your answers.
I was just told that it is UV negative and that the fabric is not synthetic. I haven't had problems with this seller at all in the past. Should I ask for better pictures or is it a 100% fake?

[BOB COLEMAN]

Hello again,
Thank you to both of you for your answers.
I was just told that it is UV negative and that the fabric is not synthetic. I haven't had problems with this seller at all in the past. Should I ask for better pictures or is it a 100% fake?

UV negative testing is no longer an assurance that an item is period. For many years, fakers have been manufacturing items that do not glow. You have two opinions on this piece. It is up to you if the advice is taken or not. Better pictures are not needed. To an experienced eye, this piece is obvious for what it is.

[wewelsburgss]

FiRST off 61/35 is THEE MOST KNOWN FAKE RZM TAG!Secondly it looks terrible,and new.Thirdly you have the opinion of according to me one of the top,if not THEE top political collectors alive today..Mr.Coleman.Dont second guess it,its BAD! MUCH different than real examples in material and construction etc etc.JUNK.

[Eric Zentner]

FiRST off 61/35 is THEE MOST KNOWN FAKE RZM TAG!Secondly it looks terrible,and new.Thirdly you have the opinion of according to me one of the top,if not THEE top political collectors alive today..Mr.Coleman.Dont second guess it,its BAD! MUCH different than real examples in material and construction etc etc.JUNK.

Well said x2

Eric

[Friedrich-Berthold]

Well said x2

Eric

I agree, surely.