Attachment 412692Attachment 412693Attachment 412694Attachment 412695Attachment 412696Attachment 412697Attachment 412698Attachment 412699Attachment 412700Attachment 412701Attachment 412702Attachment 412703Attachment 412704Attachment 412705Attachment 412706Attachment 412691The above essay manifests a thoughtful, pessimistic reading of things. The points about variation and personal taste are absolutely valid and very significant.
For myself, I have learned a great deal in the last decade despite the horrors and outrages.
A skilled person, attentive to the demands of the task, and skeptical in a healthy way can make their way in the thicket, but with some risk. To acquire all the knowledge needed is not done in an afternoon, or even with a hundred posts here. It is a more consuming task. I think Richard P was an informed collector, since he worked together with others I know and respect and upon whose analytical ability I rely.
The quality and volume of fakes today is considerable. I concentrate on textiles, since things of metal were dicey even in 1965.
The fakers were rampant in the late 1960s. The beginner has far greater resources at hand today than then.
The cannibal and the grave robber can also engage in their larceny with great ease via the digital blow, but there are also others who can see through the smoke screen of nonsense of self inflated blander.
One other point as concerns textiles is this: the German firms that made these textiles are mostly gone; I am not convinced that warehouses of unused SS Trikot are easily had as some purport here; and, most important, the nice Chinese tailors or whatever who make SS uniforms now are surely not the original artisans,
and are devoid of their skill. I never collected cheaply made field uniforms, but black tunics, and the well made fakes of these in no way really duplicate an authentic, 80 year old garment. In no way. It is also true that one can decorate a real tunic with real insignia to make something of dubious history, but which fools many people. This problem is hardly a new one, and was present for me in the 1960s, too, with the glee with which army artillery piped field tunics were elevated to general's rank, as well as with Waffenroecke.
But here is a key point......and one which defies being gainsaid.
If you read the sources, uniform tailors were a rare breed in 1936. They required special training then, and were in short supply.
I have already made the point that in the late 19th and early 20th century, the apprenticeship for a tailor was e i g h t years. Such an thing is unfeasible and unaffordable today by any stretch.
Nor are Chinese uniforms actually made as an expensive and well made III. Reich uniform of the era.
In any case, a beginning collector has access to some very fine expertise, which I surely did not have as a pup in 1964 or 1965.
But this episode of the lynch mob going after the blessed soul of Richard P. is deeply disgusting and repugnant in the extreme.
And so what if a few of his pieces turn out to be fake? Does such a fact in any way justify this digital cannibalism and witch's sabbath as had by the goons on Bianchi's wretched site?
Bookmarks