The camo looks artificially aged to me.
Cheers,
Terry
Decal over the camo????
Agree with Terry as well on the aging.
And why is the wear on the decal so much worse then the helmet?
Not for me.
Looking at this from a cell phone and old eyes so my comments are to be taken with this understanding
"Please", Thank You" and proper manners appreciated
My greatest fear is that one day I will die and my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them
"Don't tell me these are investments if you never intend to sell anything" (Quote: Wife)
Too much going on with this helmet. Don't know what the "wear" is on the interior skirt. The damage/wear on the decal...Too much "action". The damage to the decal is not from normal battle wear. Possibly liberated or cleaned or some other unnatural happening. I would pass.
Investing in a camo, find a "one looker". So far there are three negatives on this. Probably more to follow.
one looker
ET64 Normandy Heer Camo Lot #513
David is right. Camo's are almost always open to debate...but you know when you see a no questions asked example. Never have to second guess yourself when it is sitting on the shelf
"Please", Thank You" and proper manners appreciated
My greatest fear is that one day I will die and my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them
"Don't tell me these are investments if you never intend to sell anything" (Quote: Wife)
I agree with all the above, paint looks somewhat artificial, lacks wear and has no age to it IMO.
The decal (if original) looks peculiar, it has that 'dug out' look but seems to sit on top of the camo paint.
agree with all the above ;-)
"Please", Thank You" and proper manners appreciated
My greatest fear is that one day I will die and my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them
"Don't tell me these are investments if you never intend to sell anything" (Quote: Wife)
Similar Threads
Bookmarks