Become our sponsor and display your banner here
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Need Opinions on this M35

Article about: Hey guys I already posted a thread about this helmet but this one has much better pictures of it. I am looking to get a second opinion on this. Thanks for looking! Poody

  1. #1
    ?

    Default Need Opinions on this M35

    Hey guys I already posted a thread about this helmet but this one has much better pictures of it. I am looking to get a second opinion on this. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Helmet 1 (1).jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	207.7 KB 
ID:	779007Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Helmet 1 (2).jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	206.0 KB 
ID:	779008Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Helmet 1 (3).jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	200.7 KB 
ID:	779009Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Helmet 1 (4).jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	211.6 KB 
ID:	779010Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Helmet 1 (5).jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	203.8 KB 
ID:	779011Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Helmet 1 (6).jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	212.4 KB 
ID:	779012

    Thanks for looking!
    Poody

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Age
    2010
    P
    Many
     

  3. #2

    Default

    Looks like legit paint. Its in very rough shape though. I still like it, and think it makes a good starter camo. I would have bought it for the right price!

  4. #3
    ?

    Default

    After looking over the photos (for a while I might add), I am on the fence with this one.
    The liner is certainly legit, and belongs to the helmet.
    The paint appears to be period, although the lighting and use of flash makes it difficult to be sure.
    My issue is with what appears to be fresh rust in some areas, and although I assume the damage to the paint
    may be from some form of chemical spill, I see what appears to be tool scrape marks around and just behind the right
    hand rivet.
    Maybe some of the other guys have a better idea of what might have happened here.

    Brad.

  5. #4

    Default

    Looks good to me!

    Looks even better on my shelf!

  6. #5
    ?

    Default

    I see what Lidman is saying about the paint. That said with the pics its hard to say if the camo is messed with or what but for sure there was some sort of caustic reaction causing the large area on the RF of the helmet to be damaged like that.

    The personalization looks legit, for interests sake here are the units Obergefreiter Senf potentially belonged to:

    1.9.1939-1.1.1940 2. Kompanie Panzerabwehr-Abteilung 34.
    28.4.1940-14.9.1940 2. Kompanie Panzerjäger-Abteilung 34.
    15.7.1942-24.1.1943 5. Panzerjäger-Kompanie Jagd-Bataillon 1, dann 5. Panzerjäger-Kompanie Jäger-Bataillon 1, dann 2. Kompanie Panzerjäger-Abteilung 34,
    3.11.1943 nicht verwendet
    9.11.1944 Regimentsstab, Stabs- und 13.-14. Kompanie Grenadier-Regiment 456.



    Verwendungszeit: 1.9.1939 bis 21.5.1945

  7. #6

    Default

    Apart from the exterior rust issue I really like it --- nice and untouched camo imo, love the personalization!

  8. #7

    Default

    Doug, the FPN has an 'L' prefix, though. Also, the paint underneath the camo is a nice, dark, smooth SE Luftwaffe M35 blue. Shouldn't he have belonged to a LW unit?

  9. #8
    ?

    Default

    Quote by ObKrieger View Post
    Doug, the FPN has an 'L' prefix, though. Also, the paint underneath the camo is a nice, dark, smooth SE Luftwaffe M35 blue. Shouldn't he have belonged to a LW unit?
    When you put a prefix in front of a FP number you do not get a response. I know what the suffixes stand for. I do not know what the L Prefix stands for however.

  10. #9

    Default

    So I looked over it again and I am almost positive the FPN is actually L 12958, not L 12458. Also, this helmet was found in an attic here in the U.S. so it was presumably a veteran bringback. The unit for L 12958:

    Feldpostnummer 12958

    (Mobilmachung-1.1.1940) Stab Reserve-Flak-Abteilung 701,
    (27.1.1942-14.7.1942) Stab schwere Flak-Abteilung 701,
    (1.8.1943-23.3.1944) 11.9.1943 Stab schwere Flak-Abteilung 701 (o).

    This makes much more sense because it is a Luftwaffe helmet, and this unit spent the entire war in Ludwigshafen, Germany, which was taken by the U.S. 12th Armored and 94th Infantry Divisions from 21-24 March, 1945. Grenadier-Regiment 456 was destroyed in Vitebsk along with the rest of Heersgruppe Mitte in 1944, so it doesn't really make much sense for a helmet from that unit to find its way to the U.S.

  11. #10
    ?

    Default

    awesome work and yes that makes more sense! I was thinking the same thing about GR456 myself as I looked up the unit history and thought the helmet might be coming from Eastern Europe.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Opinions on a SSh-40

    In Headgear and Steel Helmets of the RKKA, Red Army, & Soviet Army
    04-23-2014, 11:54 PM
  2. 03-30-2013, 09:07 PM
  3. M42 Opinions

    In Steel Helmets
    03-29-2013, 01:59 AM
  4. Question opinions

    In Orders & Decorations of the Third Reich
    12-17-2012, 07:14 AM
  5. Another ss fez up for opinions,,,,

    In SS Uniforms and insignia
    03-30-2011, 04:46 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •