Stamps are very faint but they are there. Thanks!
Stamps are very faint but they are there. Thanks!
Can't say I can help you on the decals Danny. I'm sure the guys will be around.
I would suspect it is an ET or maybe a Quist. Still learning how to ID buy sight alone.
Regards,
Michael
"Please", Thank You" and proper manners appreciated
My greatest fear is that one day I will die and my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them
"Don't tell me these are investments if you never intend to sell anything" (Quote: Wife)
Personally I would about face and double time outta there my son...... it all looks very contrived to me ( decal aging & 'halo'/ a "dusted" patina / rivets been played with on ( possible liner swap ) ... that sort of thing.....
" I'm putting off procrastination until next week "
----
EDIT
This was just posted by same OP
SS M-18 double decal, real or fake?
bad decals. These are the same as on this one. So it's bad, as Danmark says walk away. Was hoping it might have a chance but it's not to be I'm afraid.
Hi, as said, these are not genuine decals, and looking at the size of the vent hole over the party shield I am not even sure that it is an original shell that's been re-worked. Looks like aged Chinese rubbish to me. Leon.
was going to say, i don't even like the shell
Gawd almighty no.
Brad.
Agree with the others. Apart from the obviously cleaned areas around the decals being a huge red flag, the 'purely by chance' damage to the break area of the runic decal is too much to overlook.
If it is cheap it could do as a filler in a collection but for me, I couldn't stand it.
Really appreciate the help thanks guys!
It would serve you well to read through this thread...
Advice for new helmet collectors looking for that elusive SS helmet
Similar Threads
Bookmarks