Some opinions and help please
Have the option to buy this ring.
Silver (tested), clear "835" hallmark, diameter about 19,5 mm.
Plate diameter 9 mm, runes about 6 mm high.
Enamel is real glas enamel and decor beside plate is very filigree.
Ring is for sure cast in very high quality but this is no reason for me not to be period.
For me a 50/50-one
Any opinion is welcome.
Anyone here that has a same ring for comparing?
Or pics of a sure one?
05-21-2016 06:43 PM
Very nice ring, Odal. I can't comment on its authenticity. I'd add though, that on the eighteen SS runes rings in my collection, the runes are all standard 'lightning flash' or Sieg runes. I've not previously seen runes like this on a ring. They look quite Art Deco.
Thanks for input.
Runes are no problem in this case, such runes were used in old times.
Here a part of an period advert/catalog:
I like the general look of it.
Had good advice? Saved money? Why not become a Gold Club Member, just hit the green "Join WRF Club" tab at the top of the page and help support the forum!
It actually appears to be a match to the one in your period advertising. I like it!
Searching for anything relating to, Anton Boos, 934 Stamm. Kp. Pz. Erz. Abt. 7, 3 Kompanie, Panzer-Regiment 2, 16th Panzer-Division (My father)
It's not cast is it???
'I do not think we can hope for any better thing now.
We shall stick it out to the end, but we are getting weaker of course, and the end cannot be far.
It seems a pity, but I do not think I can write more. R. SCOTT.
Last Entry - For God's sake look after our people.'
In memory of Capt. Robert Falcon Scott, Edward Wilson, Henry Bowers, Lawrence Oates and Edgar Evans. South Pole Expedition, 30th March 1912.
its the one in the advert as pointed out by Ralph,I agree.
Thanks, but look at the following pic.....
a very close one sure period the owner tells, but not exact same.
Still more opinions there.
Worth to buy the first one or not?
It`s questionable...a 50/50 for me