Thoughts on this helmet and liner?
Article about: by GIZMO8Z Interesting... I'm kind of embarrassed that I didn't know that. Why didn't they use the traditional red cross medic's insignia? The Japanese did not sign the Geneva Convention, so
-
Thoughts on this helmet and liner?
-
-
Re: Thoughts on this helmet and liner?
It's impossible to tell if it's really a PTO medic helmet without it in hand. Liner and shell are fine, but the paint, who knows?
If it's real, that is one extremely rare and expensive helmet. Without rock solid provenance, you'll be taking one hell of a chance. He's been offered $750 already.
Best Regards,
Andy
-
Re: Thoughts on this helmet and liner?
I've never seen a helmet with a dot insignia on the back... Can someone clarify?
-
Re: Thoughts on this helmet and liner?
I do not like it.
the paint job was done in the field they were never perfect like this one .
Too many red flag for a rare helmet.
chris
- - Updated - -
by
GIZMO8Z
I've never seen a helmet with a dot insignia on the back... Can someone clarify?
This is from a medic in the pacific.
chris
-
Re: Thoughts on this helmet and liner?
Interesting! Good to know
-
Re: Thoughts on this helmet and liner?
Here a picture.
-
Re: Thoughts on this helmet and liner?
Debatably a PTO Army Medic/Marine Corpsman. bugme has one here:
https://www.warrelics.eu/forum/us-m1...y-liner-13085/
A rare beast.
Best Regards,
Andy
-
Re: Thoughts on this helmet and liner?
Interesting... I'm kind of embarrassed that I didn't know that. Why didn't they use the traditional red cross medic's insignia?
-
Last edited by aj4010; 01-23-2013 at 02:07 AM.
Similar Threads
-
-
In Fallschirmjäger helmet forum
-
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks