Help with US Airborne Patches, 101st and 82nd
Article about: Sure.........
-
-
-
re: Help with US Airborne Patches, 101st and 82nd
This is a good one definitely ww2 or right after, I dont think this is a variant though good patch
-
re: Help with US Airborne Patches, 101st and 82nd
Lol - I just bought one today as well with the tab, but I know it is not WWII just by
the price. It's uniform removed, likely from the mid-late 1950's or 1960's.
( There was a 'green-back' version with a white tongue that sold
on Ebay a few weeks ago for $515 ! )
The 'snow' on the back is what to look for in a WWII patch, so this is why
I think your 101st is ok. I believe I saw this one somewhere - was it
selling for around $9 ?
The 82nd patch and tab are also ok, IMO - I like both patches.........
-
re: Help with US Airborne Patches, 101st and 82nd
by
Walkwolf
Lol - I just bought one today as well with the tab, but I know it is not WWII just by
the price. It's uniform removed, likely from the mid-late 1950's or 1960's.
( There was a 'green-back' version with a white tongue that sold
on Ebay a few weeks ago for $515 ! )
The 'snow' on the back is what to look for in a WWII patch, so this is why
I think your 101st is ok. I believe I saw this one somewhere - was it
selling for around $9 ?
The 82nd patch and tab are also ok, IMO - I like both patches.........
Thanks for your response, Steve!
I WISH MINE WAS $9! I got it from Stewart's Military Antiques for $45. Not really cheap in the grand scheme of things...
I originally tried to snipe some patches for cheap on fleabay. However, some guys were bidding like crazy on the few 101st AB patches I saw... a few went for ~$100 or more. In comparison to this... $45 aint half bad.
-
re: Help with US Airborne Patches, 101st and 82nd
The 101 looks like a Type 10(scribble eye) to me.These types create a lot of confusion rather post made or not.
Any other thoughts on it as a scribble eye?
Eric
[h=3]e plu·ri·bus u·num[/h]
-
re: Help with US Airborne Patches, 101st and 82nd
Both look ok the edges of the 101st look a little sketchy, but could just be the bad photo. I saw a white tongue variant of the 101s sell on ebay for well over 2,000 I dont know why anyone would pay that much for a patch...
-
re: Help with US Airborne Patches, 101st and 82nd
You need to find a tab for it now, Joe.........
-
re: Help with US Airborne Patches, 101st and 82nd
by
Eric Zentner
The 101 looks like a Type 10(scribble eye) to me.These types create a lot of confusion rather post made or not.
Any other thoughts on it as a scribble eye?
Eric
According to the Eagle Patch Corner website:
All Type 10's are characterized by a scribble eye-the details of which seem to be rendered with single strands of thread. Since the company which produced these in WW2, continued in production until probably 1968 (when merrowed edge Type 14s were introduced), these types create a lot of confusion. In most cases, unless you have provenance on a particular patch of this type, it is impossible to determine if it was issued during WW2 or much later.
- - Updated - -
by
Walkwolf
You need to find a tab for it now, Joe.........
Wayyyyy ahead of you. I will be updating this thread as things arrive.
-
re: Help with US Airborne Patches, 101st and 82nd
by
AmericanKraut
Both look ok the edges of the 101st look a little sketchy, but could just be the bad photo. I saw a white tongue variant of the 101s sell on ebay for well over 2,000 I dont know why anyone would pay that much for a patch...
I've read that tan edges on US insignia are a good sign that they are WWII because these patches were actually made on different colored backing (the tan edge that you say looks sketchy). Post war, they made patches on backing that was the same color as the patch itself or very dark in color.
Similar Threads
-
In Airborne and special forces
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks