Artillerie EKM

[Montag]

Hi my friends,

I've never collected an Artillerie erkennungsmarke. So I'm thinking of collecting this one this time.

11.Battr.schw.Feldhaub 227 - nr. 2 right? and is this good one?

if you have any information about this. please let me know.


from seller pic

[Montag]

Samples of similar type



12. Batterie schwere Feldhaubitze 211

[Montag]

Hmm...

11.Battr.schw.Feldhaub 227 - nr. 2?

or

2.Battr.schw.Feldhaub 11 - nr. 227?

[BlackCat1982]

This one doesn't make sense for me, it ought to be number 2 Batterie of Feldhaub 227. The 11 doesn't fit, if it is supposed to imply the II Btl then the batteries would number 4, 5 and 6. I'm not convinced this one is correct. But as you have posted here and elsewhere too I'm sure an answer won't be long in coming.

[Montag]

Hi my friend,

thanks for your comment!!

[Gunny Hartmann]

I'm a little concerned about the complete lack of any patina to the disc in the OP.

[Montag]

I think..

11. Batterie, Stab IV. Abteilung, Artillerie-Regiment 227

Mannschaftsnummer: 2


There is an answer to the same Division identification tag. (227. Infanteriedivision)



Best regards,
S.W.

18:50 PM (KST)

[meskalin]

I think this brand belongs to artillery regiment 227. The label should be called.

11th battery, Artillery Regiment 227,
role number 2.

[Rik.S]

Artillerie-Regiment 227 - Lexikon der Wehrmacht

Meskalin is right in my opinion. The emarke does look alright to me.

[Montag]

I think..

11. Batterie, Stab IV. Abteilung, Artillerie-Regiment 227

Mannschaftsnummer: 2


---> This is my wrong typing.....


11. Batterie, IV. Abteilung, Artillerie-Regiment 227

Mannschaftsnummer: 2

----> Right

And I found a new tag.


3. (leichte) Batterie, I. Abteilung, Artillerie-Regiment 227

Roll number: 50


Now it is clear. The problem was solved.



Best regards,
S.W.


12:39 AM (KST)