So we've seen a fair few Erkennungsmarken marked Pol Btl 104 on the forum. So can you please post further examples of them together in this thread so that we might once and for all sort the good from the bad.
Autopsy of Erkennungsmarke Politzei Battaillon 104
So we've seen a fair few Erkennungsmarken marked Pol Btl 104 on the forum. So can you please post further examples of them together in this thread so that we might once and for all sort the good from the bad.
This example is currently for sale online, so photo is not mine. I post it for reference and so we can finally solve the Polizei Bataillon 104 mystery.
Regards, Rik
'In war, whichever side may call itself the victor, there are no winners, but all are losers.'
Here are more examples. All photos are taken from our forum.
'In war, whichever side may call itself the victor, there are no winners, but all are losers.'
As I said before, these used a fake '7' font.
(Personally) This is why it is hard to believe the dog tags excavated from the ground.
With all of the examples above having a similar font for the unit are we now saying they are all bad or have a load of unissued ekm been later stamped with a fake Stammrollnummer?
Personally, I can say 'yes'.by BlackCat1982
The reason is that the number "7" font is not a copy of the original, just designed by a Belarusian fake.
Therefore, these are fake themselves.
If someone doesn't want to admit this, they have to prove that the number "7" font is original.
For reference, the "7" font was used for both 'Stammrollnummer' and 'unit names'.
It's a new wave.
The '1' font is the same with or without '7'.
It appears that these first started to appear around 2017, they are mentioned on WAF but there was never a consensus on them being original either.
Someone made it and posted it on several forums, but I guess there haven't been any negative comments so far. And at the auction it would have been marked as 'Rare erkennungsmarke POL BTL 104'.
Similar Threads
Posting Permissions
.
Bookmarks