Thanks for sharing @Prinz!
I have to say estnish units are not my concern, but I have my doubts on the last one (no. 98).
Probably you know more infos about it?
Thank you Austrian for your input. Yes, I understand what do you mean. This (original) kind of tags was found without number and, unfortunatly, to many of it was added the numbers by the fakers. No, I have not any infos about this ekm...simply I buyed it on ebay, in two differents moments..in the sense that the 2 half was sold in differents moments by two differents (ID) sellers. So I'm not 100% sure about it's originality. My only knowledge about it, is (as usual for me) this comparison with other original tags.
Like I show you, there are small differents in every three number 2, and in mine is missing (or is very light) the point after the number. Anyway, in my personal (and not objective) opinion the engrave of all the numbers is compatible with the ground found condition of my ekm.
I addedd just another personal opinion. My 2 Kp. tag have the "regular" upper hole. At today, all the Estn.Leg. tags with number over 400 (or without number) have the upper holes wider. Probably I will be denied, but I think that it was a kind of model used after 1943...I understand that there is any evidence about it but it's another chance for my 2 Kp. ekm.
Sorry again for my poor english..I hope that you understand all...
According to experts, the first 3 are fake.Wait for others to respond.
3 x original one Zeesen.
Ekm katscher seems also to be a fake.Zitat von SHD
Und was ist mit der 'Katscher'? Ich halte meine für gut!?
Gruß
SHD
Hallo
Oh, ganz übersehen. Die hier im Thread gezeigte weißt alle typischen Merkmale einer Kopie auf. Ich sag nur Din Satz. Zumindest hat sie den gleichen Stempelsatz wie eine andere bekannte Gurkenreihe.
Gruss, Fronti
Similar Threads
Bookmarks