Ratisbon's - Top
Display your banner here
Results 1 to 9 of 9

WW2 U.S. Airborne Wings

Article about: Hi folks, I bought a few U.S. Airborne badges way back pre forum days and have always wanted some other opinions regards originality, The other sunday i had the frame down & took the bad

  1. #1

    Default WW2 U.S. Airborne Wings

    Hi folks, I bought a few U.S. Airborne badges way back pre forum days and have always wanted some other opinions regards originality, The other sunday i had the frame down & took the badges out to try & take some decent pictures. Anyway 1st up is a pair of what i assume are war time made U.S. paratrooper qualification wings. Unfortunately unmaker marked except for a pressed in Sterling mark (silver) as opposed to a raised marking. Anyway hopefully those versed in allied insignia will give me there opinion good or bad. Thanks for looking , Regards , Paul

    WW2 U.S. Airborne Wings

    WW2 U.S. Airborne Wings

  2. #2
    ?

    Default

    Hi Paul,
    A nice basic training qualification WW2 era jump wings.
    They could be WW2 or post war , but it doesn't really matter , you can't tell and besides they are on the lowest value rung of the WW2 US Para Wings ladder.
    But it's still original .
    Cheers Rick

  3. #3

    Default

    Cheers Rick

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote by Rick W View Post
    Hi Paul,
    A nice basic training qualification WW2 era jump wings.
    They could be WW2 or post war , but it doesn't really matter , you can't tell and besides they are on the lowest value rung of the WW2 US Para Wings ladder.
    But it's still original .
    Cheers Rick
    Yep, nowt wrong with that one. It's just a difference in marking style by different makers I believe.

    Here are two of mine, one with the mark in relief as part of the casting, the other stamped after casting.

    Most believe that the clutch back fastener is post war but I am pretty sure that whilst the pin back was discontinued the clutch back was actually introduced in wartime.

    Regards

    Mark

    PS The middle picture is an error and is obviously a duplicate of the 2nd wing but for some reason I can't delete it. When i go to "edit post" the pictures are not there at all
    Click to enlarge the picture Click to enlarge the picture WW2 U.S. Airborne Wings   WW2 U.S. Airborne Wings  

    WW2 U.S. Airborne Wings   WW2 U.S. Airborne Wings  

    WW2 U.S. Airborne Wings  
    "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing he cares more about than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature with no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

  5. #5

    Default

    Very nice Mark, Thanks for showing yours .Absolutely agree about the use of clutch backs wartime. Usually flatfaced silver or brass with their patent no's on the face. Regards, Paul

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote by paulscoot View Post
    Very nice Mark, Thanks for showing yours .Absolutely agree about the use of clutch backs wartime. Usually flatfaced silver or brass with their patent no's on the face. Regards, Paul
    These are not flat faced but do have the patent numbers which I believe that to those in the know (these are a general adjunct to my collection) give more date related information themselves.

    This wing came to me on this 508th PIR oval which has a cut rather than merrowed edge so should be one of the earlier type but I am sure I read somewhere that watime ovals were shaped more like a (US) football than a geometric oval. Any ideas or is there a thread here somewhere?

    WW2 U.S. Airborne WingsWW2 U.S. Airborne WingsWW2 U.S. Airborne Wings

    Regards

    Mark
    Last edited by Watchdog; 10-09-2020 at 03:46 PM. Reason: Typo
    "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing he cares more about than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature with no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

  7. #7

    Default

    Hi mark, I don't Know much about these Ovals & only own one that is a fake, But i believe the cheese cloth type backing is a good sign of an early one. Regarding clutch backs ,here's a great web site that is quite informative that Azphil pointed me to. Dating Metallic Insignia: Clutch Fasteners

  8. #8
    ?

    Default

    I always grab any 50's metal para ovals that I find , not that there is that many around these days.
    Cheers Rick

    Attachment 1448691

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote by Rick W View Post
    I always grab any 50's metal para ovals that I find , not that there is that many around these days.
    Cheers Rick
    That is interesting. I had not heard of the metal ones at all. Stamped aluminium I guess, like a piece of coke can?
    I wonder if the positioning of the holes would be a useful authentication feature in the case of poorly executed fakes?

    @ Paul thanks for the link. From that mine appears to have 1948 dated clutches. I only have two ovals myself, this one and a modern 506th which is clearly of modern manufacture having a merrowed edge and the reverse surface sealed with a silicone like coating. However I think it may actually be what would be termed repro as it does not have the current 1st or 2nd Battalion stripes at the left and right.

    I did look out for a copy of the first volume of "Silver Wings Pinks and Greenss" but the prices are prohibitive as I do not concentrate on these badges although I do have about 20 US "wing" qualification badges. The 2nd volume seems readily available but I don't think it would suit my purpose.

    Thinking about all these badges and the ovals I think we might have a basis for a thread to discuss all the US badges generically known as "wings". Maybe there is one already and I just haven't picked it up? If it was to have a suitable title it could include such things as the CIB but I think I did see a thread for that.

    Anyone have thoughts on the subject?

    Regards

    Mark
    Last edited by Watchdog; 10-10-2020 at 02:39 PM. Reason: Typo
    "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing he cares more about than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature with no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

Similar Threads

  1. 08-20-2022, 10:30 PM
  2. WWII US Army Airborne Paratrooper Jump Wings

    In Orders, medals and decorations
    07-11-2016, 12:40 AM
  3. 03-30-2015, 12:47 AM
  4. ww2 Chaplain airborne wings?

    In Airborne and special forces
    06-19-2012, 01:49 AM
  5. WW2 US Airborne jump wings

    In Airborne and special forces
    07-09-2010, 07:30 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
MilitaryHarbor - Down
Display your banner here