by
Kohima
I fully agree that ribbons were frequently worn in the wrong order (we have all seen or owned such examples), but still say the duplicates are ‘more likely’ to be a post-service addition, by the veteran or family member, as convenient storage..
Of course, none of us can confirm either way exactly how and when they got there - and one can never say always or never - but that aside, this is a lovely example of an honest and desirable jacket to a very famous regiment and division..
I do wish to say that my previous comment about the courtroom guards all being decorated combat veterans is quite erroneous.. Although this was the intention, it was not a sustainable plan over the course of a ten month trial. With combat veterans being a priority for demobilisation and return to the States, before long, many replacements and occupation men were becoming the norm.
There is a good chance that this veteran saw some guard duty in or around the courtroom or prison, though the four pocket Class-A jacket was standard for the 1945-46 trials.
All the best to all, and stay well,
Bob
Bookmarks