The composition/pulver was a one second determinative factor for me, very quickly followed by what the others said. Jim G.
I looked again. Although i still struggled a bit, one thing i did think is that the first decal doesn't jump out as being your instantly recognisable ET - how you see with some of them.
It's one of those decals that has it's own 'feel' for sure. IMO, when original these are the nicest SS decals.
Nick
For me, the repo on the left looks like a decal, whereas the original seems to be hand painted, which I understand was a common practice.
Thanks' for posting the original post, very interesting stuff.
The repo is of course a decal.
But not sure I'm understanding your comment that it was common practice that originals were painted.
This is factually incorrect and wanted to point this out as to not confuse others.
Only in extremely rare cases would we ever see hand painted decals (typically on very very early transitional and commercial style helmets). Further these early SS helmets had hand painted runes that do not resemble these later "standardized" Sig runes.
I will note (very briefly) that the "Champaign" style SS "decals" that we see on the M35/40/42 Helmets (primarily 42's) are in fact painted. But these are airbrushed to "look like a decal" and are a high quality fraud.
"Please", Thank You" and proper manners appreciated
My greatest fear is that one day I will die and my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them
"Don't tell me these are investments if you never intend to sell anything" (Quote: Wife)
Similar Threads
Bookmarks