Just a small point of order; I seem to be the one who made an oblique rererence to metallurgy but I certainly did not suggest that any kind of testing at such a level was in any way feasible.
In any case the science is not concerned with one metal turning into another, that would be Alchemy.
My point was that it is at that level where an invisible weakness that may cause catastrophic failure may lurk and that even an x-ray is likely to miss that. Rod (Vegtiius) mentioned the piece being "proofed" (for those unaware this involves deliberate application of an over pressure discharge through the breech and barrel to proove that the specified pressure should not cause a breech explosion). This is something beyond the capability (certainly in UK) of a gunsmith and can only be legally done in a government proof house. Even this will not certify against a frame failure which although not as scary is still somewhat disconcerting but at least you know that the barrel and breech are up to the job.
I know there are no proof houses as such in the US and manufacturers voluntarily carry out the process. So how can you re-proof a piece? I'm afraid I don't know the US system.
Whatever safety protocols are in place at user / storage levels history shows us time after time that you can not legislate for stupidity and ignorance.
Now I know this is a matter of subjection but I am afraid that a visual inspection by the local gunsmith which might be ok in the case of a pristine and un-blemished or at least fully servicable piece (vis reference to scope conversions), is simply not good enough with a piece that is very pitted and corroded.
Just because the OP fired it and it did not explode does not mean that the very next round won't be the "straw that broke the camels back".
The issue of de-activation is again one of subjection but it is surely the the only way to ensure that the piece is safe and if, as stated the intention is that it never be fired how much of an issue is that?
I certainly do not advocate chopping it into pieces like we see on those awful "reality" gunsmith TV programmes (is that deactivation in the US? I don't know)
As I say, this is opinion and we all know about opinions right? I have seen what a breech explosion can do and it kind of takes the sport out of sport shooting to my way of thinking. My Idea is always to err on the side of caution.
To use an increasingly popular salutation in the current circumstances,
Stay safe
Mark
Bookmarks